subject
Business, 23.10.2019 18:50 hellokitty9440

On january 1, year 3, ruiz company spent $850 on a plant asset to improve its quality. the asset had been purchased on january 1, year 1 for $8,400 and had an estimated salvage value of $1,200 and a useful life of five years. ruiz uses the straight-line depreciation method. which of the following correctly shows the effects of the year 3 expenditure on the financial statements?

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Business

question
Business, 21.06.2019 23:30
Select the correct answer. the word intestate means that a person has died with or without a will?
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 01:00
Paar corporation bought 100 percent of kimmel, inc., on january 1, 2012. on that date, paar’s equipment (10-year life) has a book value of $420,000 but a fair value of $520,000. kimmel has equipment (10-year life) with a book value of $272,000 but a fair value of $400,000. paar uses the equity method to record its investment in kimmel. on december 31, 2014, paar has equipment with a book value of $294,000 but a fair value of $445,200. kimmel has equipment with a book value of $190,400 but a fair value of $357,000. the consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 is $574,000. what would be the impact on consolidated balance for the equipment account as of december 31, 2014 if the parent had applied the initial value method rather than the equity method? the balance in the consolidated equipment account cannot be determined for the initial value method using the information given. the consolidated equipment account would have a higher reported balance. the consolidated equipment account would have a lower reported balance. no effect: the method the parent uses is for internal reporting purposes only and has no impact on consolidated totals.
Answers: 2
question
Business, 22.06.2019 07:30
Read the following scenario and answer the question in 5-10 sentences. you are the owner of a small business that is a defendant in a lawsuit in federal court. you received bad news from your lawyer that the judge did not allow certain documents to be admitted as evidence in court and that the jury reached a $50,000 verdict in favor of the plaintiff. your lawyer tells you that it is within your legal right to hire him to file an appeal with the united states court of appeals. if the appellate court rules in your favor, you may be able to avoid paying part or all of the $50,000. evaluate your lawyer’s suggestion about appealing the decision.
Answers: 1
question
Business, 22.06.2019 08:30
An employer who is considering hiring eva has asked donna, eva’s former supervisor, for a report on eva. in truth, eva’s work for donna has been only average. however, eva is donna’s friend, and donna knows that eva probably will not get the job if she says anything negative about eva, and donna knows that eva desperately needs the job. further, donna knows that if the situation were reversed, she would not want eva to mention her deficiencies. nevertheless, it has been donna’s policy to reveal the deficiencies of employees when she has been asked for references by employers, and she knows that some of eva’s faults may be bothersome to this particular employer. finally, this employer has leveled with donna in the past when donna has asked for a report on people who have worked for him. should donna reveal deficiencies in eva’s past performance? (remember to use one of the three moral theories acceptable for this test to solve this dilemma. any discussion of any personal opinion, religious perspective, or theory other than the moral theories acceptable for this test will result in a score of "0" for this question.)
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
On january 1, year 3, ruiz company spent $850 on a plant asset to improve its quality. the asset had...
Questions
question
Health, 02.11.2020 18:40
question
Social Studies, 02.11.2020 18:40
question
SAT, 02.11.2020 18:40
Questions on the website: 13722360