Which statement is false?If a value should not change in the body of a function to which it is passed, the value should be defined const to ensure that it is not ac-cidentally modified. Attempts to modify the value of a variable defined const are caught at execution time. One way to pass a pointer to a function is to use a non-constant pointer to non-constant data. It is dangerous to pass a non-pointer into a pointer argument.

Attempts to modify the value of a variable defined const are caught at execution time

Explanation:

The false statement among the options is Attempts to edit the value of a variable defined const are caught at execution time while other options are true.

A const variable should not be modify because the main reason of having a const variable is not to make modifying it possible. If you prefer a variable which you may likely want to modify at some point, then don't just add a const qualifier on it. Furthermore, Any code which modify's a const by force via (pointer) hackery invokes Undefined Behavior

i think so.

by: nicholas