Which passage is an example of inductive reasoning? o a. reina's fingers hurt when she plays the guitar for two hours a day. she tells her mother that all guitarists feel pain when they play for a long time. o b. erin thinks blue shirts are the latest fashion trend. she sees many girls at her school wearing blue shirts and decides to buy one for herself. c. daniela thinks that watching too much tv can ruin your eyesight she consults a research book on optometry to find data that support her theory. d. beth argues that eating sweets can rot your teeth. she gets information from her dentist about the number of cavities in patients who eat a lot of candy.
A. John gets a pain in his side when he runs for more than a mile. He believes that all runners feel pain after running for more than a mile.
Inductive reasoning is a type of logical thinking that involves forming generalizations based on specific details, such as your experiences, observations, or facts you know about.
The opposite of inductive reasoning is deductive reasoning, which starts from a generalization or hypothesis, which is then confirmed or disproved based on specific experiences.
The example of inductive reasoning is passage A. John starts from his personal experience (he feels pain in his side) and then makes a generalization (all runners feel pain after running for more than a mile).
D. John gets a pain in his side when he runs for more than a mile. He believes that all runners feel pain after running for more than a mile.
Explanation: This is an example of induction, because John's reasoning starts from an individual, particular experience (his pain after running for more than a mile) which gets generalized as if it was valid for all cases (all runners, not only me, must feel pain after running for more than a mile).
Answer is A. Marco believes that cowboy boots are cool. He sees many people on the street wearing them and decides to buy a pair for himself.
Inductive reasoning is the opposite of deductive reasoning. On one side, deductive reasoning begins with a general statement or idea, then evaluates and analyses the chances to arrive to a logical conclusion. On the other, inductive reasoning creates wide generalizations based on particular observations. Basically, there is information, and then conclusions are made based on that information.
In the case of Marco, he makes a particular observation (many people wear boots on the street), and then arrives to a conclusion (he assumes that boots are cool), so he decides to go with that (he buys himself a pair of boots).
B. Kara loses her voice after practicing with the choir for two hours. She thinks that all singers lose their voices after singing for a long time.
C) Kara loses her voice after practicing with the choir for two hours. She thinks that all singers lose their voices after singing for a long time. apex answer
D. Kara loses her voice after practicing with the choir for two hours.
She thinks that all singers loses their voice after singing for a long time
Inductive reasoning makes use of a premise in order to reach a conclusion about something which makes some predictive inference by making generalizations because of a specific experience.
Because Kara lost her voice after practicing with the choir for two hours, she makes the induction that all singers lose their voice if they sing for a long time. Here, she makes a generalization as a result of her own specific experience.
I consider that passage (D) is an example of inductive reasoning. An inductive reasoning is a logical procedure based on premises in order to reach a conclusion. It involves certain degree of predictive reasoning on the part of the author or speaker by making generalizations from an specific experience. In this particular passage, Kara thinks that all singer could have problems with their voice, as she is experiencing problems with her voice too.
I don't know what the answer choices are So what are they?
The answer is C iu got it right on Apex