Someone please help me

Name three sets of opposites from the novel Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde

Stevenson shows the binary opposites of the natural and the supernatural.

Jekyll's supernatural experiment of releasing Mr. Hyde into the world.

The two entry doors to Jekyll’s house appear to be complete opposites. One is cheap and in a dark nook of a building which is identified as a ‘sinister block’. Simply by saying ‘it showed zero windows' suggests that it's darker and secrecy; maybe they have something to cover.

In the chapter ‘Dr. Jekyll was quite for ease’ L. L Stevenson describes an additional opposite with Mr. Utterson and the other folks that had been to Dr .Jekyll’s dinner. ‘In the man’s rich peace and quiet, after the charge and the tension of gaiety. ‘ This tells us that Mr. Utterson is pleased to be calm, as the other friends that have still left were quite loud and talked to him a whole lot.

An additional opposite that R. T Stevenson puts in the book is in the chapter ‘The Carew murder case’. At the start of the phase, the setting is peaceful. ‘The details were a couple of and startling’ this portrays that it was an extremely still, open up night with only fabulous features. It describes a maid searching her window in the pretty night time. Her views on the night wish very optimistic and supportive. ‘ Your woman was romantically given’ by saying this kind of it sets across for the reader which the night is usually quiet which in turn would make it easy to think and by expressing ‘romantically given’ puts throughout that this wonderful woman has a romantic take on life.

I hope this is correct, or what u were looking for

yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

it is yes as the core issue is an ever increasing majority of human workers   will become permanently unemployed as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines inevitably replace more expensive human workers with each passing year.

economic growth now and in the future requires that fewer jobs are created for human workers. this is the desirable inevitable consequence. the automation of the jobs of human workers is the most profitable economically productive activity on the planet.

so as a global society we need to have a plan to deal with this inevitable change.

automation has been, is and will always be a friend to human society if human society on a global basis is prepared to deal with the inevitable consequences.

what is key is that automation killing all jobs is only a matter of when not if.

the real question is can we get past the now invalid assumption that most humans can work for a decent wage going forward.

i spent my working career increasing automation and increasing efficiency. this consequently reduces the hours worked by humans while increasing the output economic goods and services at an ever decreasing price.

why not have ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines create the vast majority of required economic goods and services as opposed to human workers?

why not have most human workers working less and retiring earlier?

there is much more to life than working forever.

fortunately, automation has been going on for decades and will continue as an irreversible process as ever cheaper ever more intelligent automated machines permanently replace more costly human workers.

i write this answer for the people that have an open mind and are not living in the past this is what i feel most effectively deals with the tractable issues that automation creates.

the question at hand is how we deal with automation going forward as a society.

automation is only a threat because society has yet to acknowledge automation is happening let alone effectively a having a plan to address it.

a conservative libertarian free market idea where individuals choose what economic goods and services are produced in the free market as the free market supply will respond to free market demand. this is not a centrally planned communist economy.

hope this