The supreme court’s use of selective incorporation

The correct answer is C. Takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation.

Explanation:

In the U.S. law, the selective incorporation is a principle used to limit the laws enacted by states, especially those that are against the Bill of Rights or the federal laws. This principle or policy has been applied in different cases through the years to limit the actions of states; for example in 1940 in New York States the Cantwells family was arrested for preaching in their neighborhood but the Supreme Court determined this was against religious freedom and limited the actions of the States. Additionally, this does not have a general approach or objective procedure, instead, each case is analyzed individually to determine if the principle of incorporation should be applied. Thus, selective incorporation "takes a subjective case-by-case approach to the question of incorporation."

the indians would be mad that they would have to move since it caused many deaths known as the trail of tears they would of taken it to the supreme court but discrimination would have mad them lose