How did the knights of labor differ from previous labor organizations? (1 point)

it favored radical techniques such as sabotage and violent protests.
it focused on wages rather than on a wide range of working conditions.
it opened membership to unskilled workers, women, and minorities.
it attempted to establish a national political party to compete with democrats and republicans.

The correct answer is C) it opened membership to unskilled workers, women, and minorities.

The Kings of Labor differed from previous labor organizations in that it opened membership to unskilled workers, women, and minorities.

The origins of the Knights of Labor are quite mysterious. It began as a secret society in the city of Philadelphia in 1869. It became an important organization after the railroad strike of 1877. Terence V. Powderly was the leader of the organization since 1879 and those were their best years. During that time, the organization fought for better conditions for workers such as the 8-hour a day of work, equal pay for the work done, and the elimination of child labor.

post the grid otherwise i cant .

also it sounds like a math question not history.

the exact role and status of women in the roman world, and indeed in most ancient societies, has often been obscured by the biases of both ancient male writers and 19-20th century ce male scholars, a situation only relatively recently redressed by modern scholarship which has sought to more objectively assess women's status, rights, duties, representation in the arts, and daily lives; and all this from almost exclusively male source material dealing with a male-dominated roman world.

women in mythology

unlike some other ancient cultures such as the greeks who had formed a creation myth where woman was a creature secondary to man and, more specifically, in the form of pandora, a bringer of unhappiness and vices, the romans had a more neutral approach where humanity, and not specifically the male, was created by the gods from earth and water. ovid's metamorphoses, for example, does not specify whether the first human was a man or a woman. at least in a physical sense then men and women were not regarded as belonging to a different species as in the greek world, a view often reiterated in roman medical treatises.