For the purpose of this study, regard argument as true. the problem then is to decide whether it is a strong (it is important and directly related to the question) or weak (not directly related to the question or related only to trivial aspects) argument. do juries decide court cases fairly when one of the opposing parties is rich and the other is poor? no; because rich people are more likely to settle their court cases. a). strong argument b) weak argument

Before a case can be heard in a state high court, it must

Congress passed a law imposing penalties for displaying indecent material online where children could see it. if the u.s. supreme court subsequently rules that the statute conflicts with the first amendment of the u.s. constitution, the statute is void. true or false?

Father arthur terminiello, in an auditorium in chicago, delivered a vitriolic speech in which he criticized various political and racial groups and viciously condemned the protesting crowd that had gathered outside the auditorium. policemen assigned to the event were unable to prevent several disturbances by the "angry and turbulent" crowd. the police arrested terminiello for "breach of the peace." he was then tried and convicted for his central role in inciting a riot. in terminiello v. chicago (1949), the court found the ordinance unconstitutionally infringed on first amendment rights. noting that "[t]he vitality of civil and political institutions in our society depends on free discussion," the court held that speech could be restricted only in the event that it was "likely to produce a clear and present danger of a serious substantive evil that rises far above public inconvenience, annoyance, or unrest." source: oyez, terminiello v. chicago (1949) identify a constitutional provision that is common to both terminiello v. chicago (1949) and schenck v. united states (1919). based on the constitutional clause identified in part a, explain why the facts of terminiello v. chicago led to a different holding than the holding in schenck v. united states. describe an action that members of the public who disagree with the holding in terminiello v. chicago could take to limit its impact.