Why was the decision to assign jurisdiction over controversies between citizens of different states to the supreme court significant? a. it meant that the state courts, rather than the federal judiciary, would ultimately become the primary venue for resolving disputes. b. it meant that the federal judiciary, rather than the state courts, would ultimately become the primary venue for resolving disputes. c. it meant that courts at both the state and federal levels would become irrelevant to the operating of the american political system. d. it meant that the state courts would be allowed to use the power of judicial review on cases involving economic disputes.

It meant that the federal judiciary, rather than the state courts, would ultimately become the primary venue for resolving disputes.

Explanation:

The decision to assign jurisdiction over controversies between citizens of different states to the Supreme Court meant that the federal judiciary, rather than the state courts, would ultimately become the primary venue for resolving disputes.

no i don't think so.

explanation:

answer:

monkey

primate

descriptionmonkey is a common name that may refer to groups or species of mammals, in part, the simians of infraorder simiiformes. the term is applied descriptively to groups of primates, such as families of new world monkeys and old world monkeys. wikipedia

phylum: chordata

kingdom: animalia

lifespan: mandrill: 20 years, japanese macaque: 27 years, more

mass: rhesus macaque: 17 lbs, mandrill: 42 – 82 lbs, more encyclopedia of life

height: mandrill: 1.8 – 2.1 ft., japanese macaque: 1.9 ft., common marmoset: 7.4 in., golden lion tamarin: 10 in., olive baboon: 2.3 ft.

length: rhesus macaque: 1.7 ft., mandrill: 2.5 – 3.1 ft.,