Strict scrutiny: A) is the analysis employed by the court in a case involving commercial speech. B) is the analysis employed by the court in deciding an equal protection case involving discrimination on the basis of race. C) is a test of constitutionality that is satisfied if the challenged government action bore a reasonable relation to a legitimate government purpose. D) both (b) and (c).

Strict scrutiny B) is the analysis employed by the court in deciding an equal protection case involving discrimination on the basis of race.

Explanation:

Strict scrutiny is a type of legal audit that courts use to decide the defendability of certain laws. It is frequently utilized by courts when an offended party sues the legislature for discrimination. Strict scrutiny will regularly be summoned in an equivalent security guarantee. For a court to apply strict scrutiny, the assembly should either have passed a law that encroaches upon a principal right or includes a presume order. Suspect groupings incorporate race, national starting point, religion, and alienage.

yes, obviously. that violates r@pe and p*dophilia laws, which are some pretty serious laws if you ask me.