3. find the slope of a line going through the points (-18,-20) and (-18,-5).

Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?

What is the exact volume of the cylinder? 16in going into the middle of the top of the cylinder and 40in in height a) 25,600(pi)3 b)10,240(pi)3 c)1280(pi)3 d)640(pi)3

Use multiples to write two fractions equivalent to 7/9. 14/18, 8/10 6/8, 21/27 10/12, 28/36 14/18, 21/27