It’s clear that this course teaches a combination of analytical and euclidean geometry. based on your experiences so far, which approach to geometry do you prefer? why? which approach is easier to extend beyond two dimensions? what are some situations in which one approach to geometry would prove more beneficial than the other? describe the situation and why you think analytical or euclidean geometry is more applicable.

i don't even know man. edge inuity be messing with us. i had to ask a question too.

i can you with this sweetie!

step-by-step explanation:

the largest number of the four options is 1.8 x 10-2

you have it in scientific notation.

1.80 x 10-6   = 0.00000180

1.80 x 10-4   = 0.000180 (bigger, or "less small", than the former one)

so

1.8 x 10-2       = 0.0180. as you see. the "less small", or the biggest one of them all.

as you have negative exponent, it means you are dividing 1.8 by 100 (i.e. moving the dot towards left, two times).

if you had positive exponent for the scientific notation, power of tenths, you would be multiplying times 100 (moving the dot towards right) as below:

1.8 x (10)2 = 180

so. if you have negative exponent in scientific notation, move the dot toward left. if it is positive, toward right as many times the exponent tells you.