Whether a grant proposal is funded quite often depends on the reviewers. suppose a
group of research proposals was evaluated by a group of experts as to whether the
proposals were worthy of funding. when these same proposals were submitted to a
second independent group or experts, the decision to fund was reversed in 30% of the
cases. if the probability that a proposal is judged worthy of funding by the first peer
review group is .2, what are the probabilities of these events? (4 points. 1-1/3 point for
each part of the question.)
a. worthy proposal is approved by both groups
b. worthy proposal disapproved by both groups
c. worthy proposal is approved by one group

step-by-step explanation:

i believe its "c" because all of the other options include a but it could be d because there is a way of financing with cash at certain places but its uncommon.

college

b. 1.25 hr

step-by-step explanation:

if you have a constant speed of 60 mph, then you have a ratio between 60 mi. to 1 hr. dividing both sides by 60 we get the ratio

1 mi. to

then mult. both sides by 75 we get the ratio

75 mi. to

simplifying we get

75 mi. to

or 1.25 hr.

c) the median for town a 30" is greater than the median for town b 25"

step-by-step explanation:

town a, median = q2 = 30

town b, median - q2 = 25

so the median for town a 30" is greater than the median for town b 25"