Which regression line properly describes the data relationship in the scatterplot?

the mistake in the pattern is that :

b. the decimal point was moved one too many place values each time

the correct pattern could be made by :

b. moving the decimal point to the right the same numbers of place values as the exponents

answer: it's d

step-by-step explanation:

(1,-1) i hope this

step-by-step explanation:

c.

step-by-step explanation:

simple you would first have to get   a negative number where as 1 to be multiplied by 24 and then you would have to multiply 6 time 4 and then repeat that process until you reach your term