Serena says that if a regression line is drawn correctly in a scatterplot, there will always be the same number of points above
the line as there are below the line. Which of these must be a counterexample to her claim?
a scatterplot with an odd number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 0 of the points
a scatterplot with an even number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 0 of the points
a scatterplot with an odd number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 1 of the points
a scatterplot with an even number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 2 of the points

A) a scatterplot with an odd number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 0 of the points.

Step-by-step explanation:

A) a scatterplot with an odd number of points in which the correct regression line passes directly through 0 of the points.

Step-by-step explanation:

the answer is: d) o, f, and kr.

atomic radius of bromine (br) is 114 pm.

atomic radius of oxygen (o) is 73 pm.

atomic radius of fluorine (f) is 72 pm.

atomic radius of krypron (kr) is 112 pm.

the atomic radius of a chemical element is a measure of the size of its atom.

the atomic radius varies with increasing atomic number, but usually increases because of increasing of number of electrons.

the atomic radius decreases across the periods because an increasing number of protons, because greater attraction between the protons and electrons.

cant see photo

step-by-step explanation: