Mathematics, 21.04.2020 00:52 Kittylover65

Two major automobile manufacturers have produced compact cars with engines of the same size. We are interested in determining whether or not there is a significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) when testing for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles. A random sample of eight cars from each manufacturer is selected, and eight drivers are selected to drive each automobile for a specified distance. The following data (in miles per gallon) show the results of the test. Assume the population of differences is normally distributed.
Driver Manufacturer A Manufacturer B
1 32 28
2 27 22
3 26 27
4 26 24
5 25 24
6 29 25
7 31 28
8 25 27
A) The mean for the differences is a. 0.50b. 1.5c. 2.0d. 2.5B) The test statistic is a. 1.645b. 1.96c. 2.096d. 2.256
C) At 90% confidence the null hypothesis a. should not be rejectedb. should be rejectedc. should be revisedd. None of these alternatives is correct

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: jjimenez0276

(A) The mean for the differences is 2.0.

(B) The test statistic is 1.617.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a random sample of eight cars from each manufacturer is selected, and eight drivers are selected to drive each automobile for a specified distance.

The following data (in miles per gallon) show the results of the test;

Driver Manufacturer A Manufacturer B

1 32 28

2 27 22

3 26 27

4 26 24

5 25 24

6 29 25

7 31 28

8 25 27

Let $\mu_1$ = mean MPG for the fuel efficiency of Manufacturer A brand

$\mu_2$ = mean MPG for the fuel efficiency of Manufacturer B brand

SO, Null Hypothesis, H_0 : $\mu_1-\mu_2=0$ or $\mu_1= \mu_2$ {means that there is a not any significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) when testing for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles}

Alternate Hypothesis, H_A : $\mu_1-\mu_2\neq 0$ or $\mu_1\neq \mu_2$ {means that there is a significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles}

The test statistics that will be used here is Two-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviations;

T.S. = $\frac{(\bar X_1-\bar X_2)-(\mu_1-\mu_2)}{s_p\sqrt{\frac{1}{n_1}+\frac{1}{n_2} } }$ ~ t__n__1+_n__2-2

where, $\bar X_1$ = sample mean MPG for manufacturer A = $\frac{\sum X_A}{n_A}$ = 27.625

$\bar X_2$ = sample mean MPG for manufacturer B = $\frac{\sum X_B}{n_B}$ = 25.625

s_1 = sample standard deviation for manufacturer A = $\sqrt{\frac{\sum (X_A-\bar X_A)^{2} }{n_A-1} }$ = 2.72

s_2 = sample standard deviation manufacturer B = $\sqrt{\frac{\sum (X_B-\bar X_B)^{2} }{n_B-1} }$ = 2.20

n_1 = sample of cars selected from manufacturer A = 8

n_2 = sample of cars selected from manufacturer B = 8

Also, $s_p=\sqrt{\frac{(n_1-1)s_1^{2}+(n_2-1)s_2^{2} }{n_1+n_2-2} }$ = $\sqrt{\frac{(8-1)\times 2.72^{2}+(8-1)\times 2.20^{2} }{8+8-2} }$ = 2.474

(A) The mean for the differences is = 27.625 - 25.625 = 2

(B) The test statistics = $\frac{(27.625-25.625)-(0)}{2.474 \times \sqrt{\frac{1}{8}+\frac{1}{8} } }$ ~ t_1_4

= 1.617

(C) Now at 10% significance level, the t table gives critical values between -1.761 and 1.761 at 14 degree of freedom for two-tailed test. Since our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject our null hypothesis.

Therefore, we conclude that there is a not any significant difference in the mean MPG (miles per gallon) when testing for the fuel efficiency of these two brands of automobiles.

Answer from: Quest

x = 17

step-by-step explanation:

1st step: isolate x.

24 - 3x = -27

-24 -24

-3x = -51

2nd step: divide.

-3x = -51

3 3

x = 17

hope this

Answer from: Quest

d is the answer

step-by-step explanation:

Another question on Mathematics

Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04

To show that polygon abcde is congruent to polygon fghij, a must be used to make the two polygons coincide. a sequence of two transformations that can be used to show that polygon abcde is congruent to polygon fghij is .

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 21.06.2019 14:00

Demonstrate the proof of your new polynomial identity through an algebraic proof and a numerical proof in an engaging way! make it so the whole world wants to purchase your polynomial identity and can't imagine living without it! you must: label and display your new polynomial identity prove that it is true through an algebraic proof, identifying each step demonstrate that your polynomial identity works on numerical relationships create your own using the columns below. see what happens when different binomials or trinomials are combined. square one factor from column a and add it to one factor from column b to develop your own identity. column a column b (x − y) (x2 + 2xy + y2) (x + y) (x2 − 2xy + y2) (y + x) (ax + b) (y − x) (cy + d)

Answers: 3

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:30

Which equation could represent the relationship shown in the scatter plot? y=−3x−2 y=−3/4x+10 y=−2/3x+1 y=9x−12 scatter plot with x axis labeled variable x and y axis labeled variable y. points go from upper left to lower right.

Answers: 1

Answer

Mathematics, 22.06.2019 01:30

Write 37/22 as a decimal rounded to the nearest hundredth.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Two major automobile manufacturers have produced compact cars with engines of the same size. We are...

Questions