2 dot plots on number lines going from 90 to 360 in increments of 60. The dot plot titled Pepper Hill Road Home Prices has 0 dots above 90, 1 above 180, 3 above 210, 2 above 240, 4 above 270, 3 above 300, and 1 above 330. The dot plot titled Cinnamon Court Home Prices has 1 dot above 90, 1 above 180, 2 above 210, 3 above 240, 3 above 270, 3 above 300, 1 above 330, and 0 above 360. A real estate agent used the mean and MAD to argue that the home prices of Pepper Hill Road were higher and less variable than those of Cinnamon Court. What is the agent’s error? He should have used the median and IQR because the data is symmetric. He should have used the median and IQR because of the outlier. He should have compared the median and mean. He should have compared the MAD and IQR.

i am currently in the exact same situation rn. algebra2/adv algebra is killing

step-by-step explanation:

step-by-step explanation:

no solution.

one way is to plot 2 points and connect them which is what the answer choices seem to be doing

it seems to be using the y intercept and the slope

y=mx+b, m=slope, b=y-intercept (where the line hits the y axis)

slope=rise/run

y-intercept is where the line croses the y axis which is the y value where x=0

you seem to have given the wrong slope (you didn't put a number in front of te x, it should be 2/3 or 3/2 looking at the answer options)

y=? x-1

m=? because of your fault

b=-1

so it has a slope of ? and y intercept of -1, meaning it pases through (0,-1)

so draw point (0,-1) (so answer is one of the first 2 option)

if slope is 2/3, then go up 2 and right 3 then draw line through those 2 points

if slope is 3/2, then go up 3 and right 2 then draw line through those 2 points