Mark says that the number 2 is a rational number because he can write it as the fraction > Is Mark correct? Why or why not?
O Mark is correct because the denominator, 1, is an integer.
Mark is correct because the fraction is equal to V2.
Mark is not correct because 2 is not equal to the fraction
✓
Mark is not correct because a fraction is rational only if the numerator and the denominator are both integers.

C and D.

Step-by-step explanation:

I am guessing that he wants to find if 2 is a rational number by comparing it to  the fraction

There are a couple of reasons why Mark is not correct:

1. A number is rational only if it can be written as a fraction made up of the numerator and denominator as integers.

2. The fraction is not equal to 2, so, he is wrong.

So, C and D would be correct.

NOTE: In case I misinterpreted the question, use 1. to judge if it is rational or not, you should get your answer.

points are handed out whenever you post answers.

brainliest answers are handed out by the person asking the question, so whether your answer is picked depends entirely on whether the asker bothers to pick

if you're asking about your rank, it depends on having a certain number of points and a certain number of brainliest answers. for example, at the time of this writing, i have 44338 points out of 15000 needed for the next (nearly triple the requirement! ) but i only have 24 out of 50 required brainliest answers. this number decays, meaning after a certain amount of time (i think about a month), the total number of brainliest answers you've earned doesn't count toward this total. (i've been stuck at the same rank for a long

the lesson to learn here is that you shouldn't worry about points or rank. chances are, no matter how good an answer you may provide, your efforts will go mostly unnoticed unless you focus on the newest/most active questions that get posted.