Which answer needs to be true to be able to use the SSS Congruence Postulate to prove △ABC≅△DBC? AB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ and ∠ACB≅∠DCB ∠ACB≅∠DCB and ∠A≅∠D AB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ and AC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ AB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DB¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯ or AC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯≅DC¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯

The correct option is;

 and  

Step-by-step explanation:

The steps to prove that ΔABC ≅ ΔDBC with the SSS Congruence postulate

We have;

Statement,                     Reason

BC ≅ BC,                       Reflexive property

,                      Option selected

,                      Option selected

ΔABC ≅ ΔDBC,              SSS Congruency Postulate

Therefore, whereby all three sides of the triangles ABC and DBC are congruent, then ΔABC is congruent to ΔDBC.                      

answer:

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left.

step-by-step explanation:

the general equation for the dissociation of a weak base is

b + h₂o   ⇌   bh⁺ + oh⁻

according to le châtelier's principle, when a stress is applied to a system at equilibrium, the system will respond in a way that tends to relieve the stress.

if you apply a stress by adding more bh⁺ or oh⁻,   the system will respond by moving in a direction that gets rid of the added ions.

the position of equilibrium will shift to the left, forming more of the undissociated base.

6mm^3 or .6cm^3

      216

      /   \

  36     6

  /   \     /

6     6   6

factor trees are nice.