Help I dont understand this Identify any transformations that are used in each image below.
Some images may have multiple answers so make sure to include them all.

-Reflections - how many lines of symmetry and what specific type: vertical (y-axis), horizontal (x-axis), diagonal (y=x or y=-x)
-Rotations - of which order or how many degrees/angle of rotation

a. Reflectional symmetry only. The mirror line is vertical along the center of the sunglasses. The left half mirrors over this line to get the right half, and vice versa. There isn't any rotational symmetry because we can't rotate the glasses (some angle between 0 and 360 exclusive of both endpoints) to have the image be the same as the preimage.

b. Rotational symmetry only. The puzzle can be rotated 90 degrees and the before and after image will be the exact same. There isn't any reflectional symmetry here.

c. Reflectional symmetry and rotational symmetry. Effectively a combination of parts a) and b). We have a horizontal line of symmetry to go with a vertical one. The angle of rotation is 180 degrees.

d. Reflectional symmetry and rotational symmetry.  Similar to part c). This time the angle of rotation is 360/3 = 120 degrees. There are 3 lines of symmetry and they all pass through a vertex of the triangle, and the symmetry lines are perpendicular to the opposite side.

e. Reflectional symmetry and rotational symmetry. We can rotate 180 degrees and not change the image. There are two lines of symmetry which pass through the center, one line is horizontal and the other vertical.

f. Rotational symmetry only. We don't have reflectional symmetry due to the smaller petals not matching up when reflections happen. But we can rotate the figure 120 degrees the same way we can with figure d.

step-by-step explanation:

30% of $420 is 0.30($420) = $126 and $420 + $126 = $546.

or, 130% of $420 is 1.3($420) = $546.

notice that this is not the $600 original list price with which we started.

why doesn't this work?

the method does not work because 30% of $420 is not the same amount as the 30% of $600. it may seem obvious when stated this way, but it is a very common error made on problems of this type. we cannot just use the same percent and get back to the original amount because we are taking that percent of a different value.

to work problems of this type correctly, it is generally best to write an equation for the situation and then solve.

example: since (100% – 30%)(original price) = (sale price)

70% of the   (original price) is $420.

0.7x   = 420

equation image indicator

x = 600

the original cost was $600.

we may also solve this problem using the two-step method. working the problem in two steps requires us to use more algebra skills. we have to know that x = 1x (identity property of multiplicationtext annotation indicator) and that 1x – 0.3x = 0.7x (subtracting like terms). then we solve the problem as follows:

(original price) – 30%(original price) = sale price

x – 0.3x = 420

0.7x = $420

equation image indicator

x = 600

the original cost was $600.  

note that with both of the above methods we do obtain the correct original amount.

example: after a 5% pay raise, hermione is earning $22,680 per year. what was she earning before the pay raise?

105% of (original salary) = current salary

1.05x = 22,680

equation image indicator

x = 21,600

hermione earned $21,600 per year before the pay raise.

this is an example so maybe you will get how to at least do it!

1. 180°. the sum of the interior angles of a triangle is 180°, for the equilateral triangle that it has three equals side is 60°+60°+60°=180°.

2. 60°. each interior angle of a equilateral triangle is 60°

3. 120°. the measure of ∠m is 120°, the sum of the angles ∠m and ∠n is equal to 180°. so, in order to find the measure of ∠m, we have ∠m+∠n=180° > ∠m=180°-∠n > ∠m=180°-60°=120°.

4. 360°. the sum of the exterior angles of an equilateral triangle is ∠m+∠r+∠x=120°+120°+120°=360°. the exterior angles of any triangle always add 360°.