Kathleen and Arnob both run from the park entrance along a loop. Kathleen starts walking from the park entrance and gets a 5-mile head start on Arnob. The graph shows how far they have both traveled. A coordinate grid labeled Distances Traveled with Time in minutes along the horizontal x-axis and Distance in miles along the vertical y-axis with 2 lines. The first line is labeled y equals (StartFraction 1 over 15 EndFraction) x plus 5 and passes through (0, 5) and (60, 9). The second line is labeled y equals (StartFraction 2 over 15 EndFraction) x. The lines appear to intersect at between 70 and 80 along the x-axis and 10 on the y-axis. How many minutes does it take Arnob to catch up to Kathleen?

you probably already have the answer but anyways it's b. 15.0

step-by-step explanation:

not only in mathematics, scientific proof also are required in the other field of science. also maths proofs are of particular structure, containing steps and logics. so proving is like doing science, it is science. that's why it is important to prove. 

an inaccurate proof leads to errors, or stating results that are not accurate.  which wil mess the probelm up you dont want this

< xcy ≅ < xby

step-by-step explanation:

in δcax and δbax,

so, δcax ≅ δbax (side-angle-side or sas)

since δcax ≅ δbax, we can conclude < acx ≅ < abx

in δacy and δaby,

so, δacy ≅ δaby (side-angle-side or sas)

since δacy ≅ δaby, we can conclude < acy ≅ < aby

now,

< acy ≅ < aby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < abx + < xby

=> < acx + < xcy ≅ < acx + < xby   (since < acx ≅ < abx already proved above)

subtracting < acx from both sides, we get

< acx + < xcy -< acx ≅ < acx + < xby -< acx

cancelling out < acx and -< acx from both sides, we get

< xcy ≅ < xby (proved)

answer: 40392

step-by-step explanation:

10098 x 4 = 40392