Which statement best explains if the graph correctly represents the proportional relationship y = 3.5x? A graph of a coordinate plane is shown. Points are graphed at 1 and 3.5 and 2 and 7. The points are joined by a line.

It does, the points shown on the line would be part of y = 3.5x.
It does not, proportions cannot be represented on a graph.
It does not, the points shown on the line would not be part of y = 3.5x.
It does, all proportions can be shown on the graph of this line.

alot

step-by-step explanation:

its a wood chuck that can chuck wood

aloha~! my name is zalgo and i am here to you out on this amazing day. to answer your question, yes, nonzero numbers can have a greatest common factor and that would be 1. still don't get it? let me considering every number is divisible by 1 and hence every number has 1 as a factor of theirs. so, if 2 nonzero numbers didn't share any gcf (greatest common factor), they would still have a factor in common and that would be 1.

i hope that this ! : p

"stay and stay proud! " - zalgo

(by the way, do you mind marking me as brainliest? i'd greatly appreciate it! mahalo! x3)

step-by-step explanation:

we have

using a graphing tool

see the attached figure

this is a quadratic equation (vertical parabola) open up

the vertex is a > vertex

the domain of the function is all real > interval (-∞,∞)

the range of the function is the > [-6.125,∞)

the function has two x->   and

the function is increasing over the > (0.25,∞)

the function is decreasing over the > (-∞,0.25)

wouldn't that be a) 1

4=4x then divide 4 on both sides and you get x=1