subject
Mathematics, 05.02.2021 21:40 Jmajano99

Juli says she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write an infinite number of ratios that are equivalent to 6:10. Which statement explains whether Juli is correct?
a. She is correct because she can multiply 6 and 10 by any number to form an equivalent ratio.
b. She is correct because 6:10 can be written as 1:2 and there are an infinite number of ratios for 1:2.
c. She is not correct because the multiplication table does not include multiples of 10.
d. She is not correct because 6:10 is equivalent to 3:5 and there are only 9 ratios in the multiplication table that are equivalent to 3:5.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
How to solve a simultaneous equation involved with fractions?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Tom had a total of $220 and he spent $35 on a basketball ticket . what percent of his money did he have left?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:30
Me with this one question, and i'll upvote the brainliest answer
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 22.06.2019 00:20
Once george got to know adam, they found that they really liked each other. this is an example of what factor in friendship
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Juli says she can use the patterns of equivalent ratios in the multiplication table below to write a...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.08.2019 15:10
Questions on the website: 13722362