Answers: 1
Mathematics, 20.06.2019 18:04
Here is their argument. given the obtuse angle x, we make a quadrilateral abcd with ∠dab = x, and ∠abc = 90◦, and ad = bc. say the perpendicular bisector to dc meets the perpendicular bisector to ab at p. then pa = pb and pc = pd. so the triangles pad and pbc have equal sides and are congruent. thus ∠pad = ∠pbc. but pab is isosceles, hence ∠pab = ∠pba. subtracting, gives x = ∠pad−∠pab = ∠pbc −∠pba = 90◦. this is a preposterous conclusion – just where is the mistake in the "proof" and why does the argument break down there?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 15:10
Julia chooses a card at random from her set of cards. what is the probability that the card is labeled cat or hamster?
Answers: 2
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 20:20
Select the correct answer. what is the exact value of sin (157.5°)? a. 'sqrt(2 - sqrt(2))/2 b. *"-"'sqrt(2 + sqrt(2))/29 c.'sqrt(2 + sqrt(2))/4" d. "-"sqrt(2 + sqrt(2))/4)
Answers: 3
4^-2 * 7^-2 select the equivalent expression...
English, 05.05.2020 03:01
Biology, 05.05.2020 03:01
Social Studies, 05.05.2020 03:01
Biology, 05.05.2020 03:02
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 03:02
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 03:02
Mathematics, 05.05.2020 03:02
History, 05.05.2020 03:02