Is the relationship between the variables in the table a direct variation, an inverse variation, or neither? If it is a direct or inverse variation write a function to model it x:9, 11, 13, 15
Y:-17, -1, 6, 27
a.
-153
inverse variation; y
11
17
b. direct variation; y
c.
neither

the first dot plot best represents the data

plzplzplzplz mark brainliest and have a good day

step-by-step explanation:

no of data

divide by no of mode

answer: the two figures are congruent.

step-by-step explanation: they're congruent because figure efgh is reflected across the x and y axis but it was also rotated.

hope it !