What is the most misleading aspect of this graph that might lead one to the wrong conclusion?

connecting the data points with a line

scale of the y-axis

scale of the x-axis

spacing of the grid

(graph attached)

to plot points   for x just start at the origin (middle) and go to the left however many times it say(if the number is a positive) if the number is a negative then go right however many times it says if it is 0 go nowhere

now keep you pencil there and go up however many times it says on y(if it is positive) if it is negative then go down however many times it says. if it says 0 go nowhere.

you have just plotted a point! now when you finish plotting all of them connect them with a ruler

plot each point as (-3, 7), (0,4), (3,1), (8,-4)   in the parenthesis on the left of the comma is x and the right is y.

step-by-step explanation:

divide, then simplify your answer.

1. make -15.66 ÷   5.8 a fraction. then divide.

2. simplify.  

3. final answer.  

a) 0

step-by-step explanation:

i^413 x i^0 = 0 as any number multiplied by a zero is

happy to

pls mark as brainliest.

it's possible to build a triangle with side lengths of 3, 3, and 9.- true ( b.)