subject
Mathematics, 01.08.2019 03:30 ChikiChu

Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? if not, give a counterexample. sequence: 1, 2, 3, 6, 18, 108, conjecture: multiply the previous 2 terms to get the next term. a. yes, the rule holds. b. no; 3 is a counterexample. c. no; 6 is a counterexample. d. no; 108 is a counterexample.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Mathematics

question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 16:00
Josephine has a great garden with and area of 2x2 + x - 6 square feet
Answers: 2
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:00
Arley is building a model of a city map. in one part of the city, three roads form a right triangle, which harley draws as triangle abc, with the following measures: m∠b=90° and m∠a=30°. in his scale model, the hypotenuse of triangle abc, ac¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯, has a length of 817−−√ cm. what is the value of a (the length of bc¯¯¯¯¯¯¯¯)?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 17:40
Long division the problem is 40 ➗ 348 = ?
Answers: 1
question
Mathematics, 21.06.2019 18:30
Add the fractions and simplify 1/2+ 1/3
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Is the given conjecture a valid rule for the following sequence? if not, give a counterexample. seq...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 01:00
question
Biology, 20.02.2021 01:00
question
Mathematics, 20.02.2021 01:00
Questions on the website: 13722363