According to the establishment clause, how would a court rule on this case? as a direct violation of the clause because government institutions cannot support religious institutions for any reason as a violation of the clause because the government gave more money to religious schools than public schools as in compliance with the clause because the government’s action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled as in compliance with the clause because the government gave money to fewer religious schools than public schools

The answer is:  as in compliance with the clause because the government’s action was for a secular purpose, did not advance a particular religion, and was unentangled

Ever since the first amendment to the constitution was created, the government are banned to make any form of programs that enforce a certain religion to the citizens. This amendment was made to support one of the basic rights of the citizens (freedom of religion). As long as governments actions or programs do not specifically advance a particular religion, the court would rule in compliance of the case.

answer; /// (a) and (b) ; /// but i believe the correct answer is ; /apart from fines and jail time, driving under the influence puts the life of the driver and everyone else on the road at risk; (b)

answer; ok in rural area most people depend on private transportation(cars),pick up truck,donkey and buggy: ),and urban people can walk or ride public transportation,bus,train cab,uber.