What did william shakespeare spend part of his money on

Shakespeare sold the play to the theater and ceased to be the owner of his work. It became a property of the theatre, and the author was not paid for repeated performances of the play, he did not receive anything and for the publication of his work. For example, Shakespeare's fee for Hamlet was probably no more than £10. Even if we consider that the value of money then was much more weighty, then it is hardly possible to consider such payment enough for the play, recognized subsequently almost the most popular in the world repertoire. It is natural that Shakespeare could not provide his own existence with literary work. He lived on the income from participation in the acting partnership, in the general cashier of which invested all his money. Part of this money went to rent a land plot, where the theatre was built, and to build the building itself; The other is to pay for the current costs of organizing submissions. The revenue of the theater consisted of money that paid viewers for viewing the presentation. Basically, these funds went to cover the theatrical expenses, and the remainder was divided between the actors-shareholders.

William Shakespeare was an actor, playwright, poet, and theatre entrepreneur in London. Most of his money went to secure his family's position in Stratford. He also part-owned another London theatre and a production company. By the early 17th century, Shakespeare had become very prosperous. And back in his hometown of Stratford-upon-Avon in Warwickshire, he invested wisely in land and property and reportedly bought and sold grain. He was a very wealthy man.

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.