"it is proposed that humble application be made for an act of parliament of great britain, by virtue of which one general government may be formed in america, including all the said colonies, within and under which government each colony may retain its present constitution, except in the particulars wherein a change may be directed by the said act." —from albany plan of union, 1754 which of the following is a true statement regarding the albany plan of union? (5 points) question 6 options: 1) it successfully united the colonies to provide support to the british in the seven years' war. 2) although it was supported by the conference members, the colonial governments rejected it. 3) american indians joined the british cause because of promises made to them in the document. 4) colonists did not want to support the war effort, which led to the document and resistance.

2) Athough it was supported by the conference members, the colonial governments rejected it.

Explanation: The true statement regarding the Albany Plan of Union, 1754, is although it was supported by the conference members, the colonial governments rejected it. In 1754 the American colonies were about to enter the French and Indian War. Britain and France were fighting over territories in America. The Albany Plan of Union was meant to establish a plan of defense for the colonies, should they be attacked by France. The delegates supported the plan but the colonial governments rejected it.

22, 28

step-by-step explanation:

explanation:

actually, not all representation was acceptable based on this little piece of article, in 1776, the second continental congress issued the declaration of independence, stating their specific grievances with the british monarchy and why they were going to create a separate government. after the colonies separated from the british monarchy and formed the united states of america, they had to answer some crucial questions: 1) if not a monarchy, what type of government was the united states going to have? 2) what kind of government was going to protect the people without violating their individual liberties?