Write an essay in which you do all of the following: 1) briefly summarize the debate between eggers/o’leary and donahue, detailing their arguments carefully but briefly (20%), 2) compare/contrast the policy issues in the articles/websites (at #4 and #5 above) and tell how they relate to this debate between eggers/o’leary and donahue, (20%) 3) explain which of the above articles (eggers/o’leary or donahue) seems to use the “principle-agent dilemma” as its primary explanatory model for state/federal relations, and which article seems to primarily see these issues as “collective action problems.” (remember that these are discussed in the federalism today video lecture.) (10%) and 4) given all of this, tell which of the authors (eggers/o’leary or donahue) you find most persuasive and why. for each of these policy issues (the social and environmental policies above), is the “principal-agent dilemma” or the “collective action problem” a more effective explanatory model, or are they both crucial to understanding state/federal relations ? do you think our federal system encourages “laboratories of democracy” or a “race to the bottom? ” or does it depend on which policy and who’s in power? (50%)