To satisfy a debt owed to a creditor, a son executed and delivered to the creditor a warranty deed to a large tract of undeveloped land. the creditor promptly recorded the deed. shortly thereafter, she built a house on the property and has lived there ever since. the son never actually owned the land. it belonged to his father, but the father had promised to leave the property to the son. later, the father died and his will devised the property to the son. pressed for money, the son then sold the land to an investor by warranty deed, which the investor promptly recorded. although the investor paid full value for the property, he purchased it strictly for investment and never visited the site. he therefore did not realize that the creditor was living there, and knew nothing of the son's earlier deed to the creditor. the jurisdiction in which the land is located has the following statute: "a conveyance of an estate in land (other than a lease for less than one year) shall not be valid against any subsequent purchaser for value without notice thereof unless the conveyance is recorded."which of the following is the most likely outcome of a quiet title action brought by the creditor against the investor? a the creditor prevails, because the son had no title to convey to the investor. b the creditor prevails, because the investor was not a purchaser for value without notice of the creditor's interest. c the investor prevails, because under the doctrine of estoppel by deed, title inures to the benefit of the original grantee only as against the grantor. d the investor prevails, because under the recording acts, the deed from the son to the creditor was not in the chain of title and hence did not constitute notice to the investor.