subject
Social Studies, 31.07.2019 23:30 meme6229

In response to the objection that if individuals obeyed their consciences, they could decide anything, the author argues that the designated decision makers could decide anything, too. this response is: a) irrelevant, because the objector does not imply that people should be forced to disobey their consciences. b) irrelevant, because the author states that responsibility is often an uncomfortable burden. c) relevant, because the objector does not state that politicians are better decision makers than are other individuals. d) relevant, because the author implies that politicians ought to obey their consciences, too.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 19:20
About political condition and history of nepal
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 04:30
What is the relationship between surface winds in the northern and southern hemisphere?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 10:00
Wich of the following lines of poetry contains a simile
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 17:30
Which answer best describes the main purpose of the monroe doctrine? a to establish fixed borders in the western territories b to keep europe from further colonizing the western hemisphere c to limit the ability of the free states to protect runaway slaves d to promote settlement of the louisiana purchase
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In response to the objection that if individuals obeyed their consciences, they could decide anythin...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 23.09.2020 14:01
question
Spanish, 23.09.2020 14:01
question
Mathematics, 23.09.2020 14:01
question
Social Studies, 23.09.2020 14:01
Questions on the website: 13722360