To avoid the classic design mistake of “silver bullet syndrome,” the analyst should select one: a. increase the schedule to include learning time b. move proposed changes into future versions c. not switch or upgrade development tools unless there is a compelling need d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true e. use rapid application development techniques or timeboxing

d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true

Explanation:

Silver Bullet Syndrome defined as the belief that the next drastic change in  tools, resources or procedures will put an end to all the problems that exist within a company. According to my research on the silver bullet syndrome, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the analyst should not use a design tool that appears too good to be true. Since designs like this that provide miraculous solutions are always false or wrong.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .