Hostile aggression differs from instrumental aggression in that instrumental aggression a) is more destructive than hostile aggression. b) involves inflicting pain as a means to an end. c) is more likely to result in retaliation. d) often follows from anger or frustration. e) usually involves inflicting only psychological pain, and not physical pain

involves inflicting pain as a means to an end.

Explanation:

According to my research on studies conducted by behaviorists, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the main difference between these two aggression is that Instrumental aggression involves inflicting pain as a means to an end. In other words it is aggression shown in order to achieve a certain goal.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

are there actual statements because if not my answer would be: that using the five senses the author can create a sense of worth in an object to appeal to the reader and create meaning.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.