You are getting ready to open the shoe hut, but you need to need to determine whether you have the absolute or comparative advantages in the production of specific items. this will you determine which product is the best for specialization.

The maker that requires a littler amount contributions to deliver a decent is said to have an outright favorable position in creating that great.

Explanation:

Similar bit of leeway alludes to the capacity of involved with produce a specific decent or administration at a lower opportunity cost than another.

Similar favorable position stipulates that nations ought to have some expertise in a specific class of items for send out, yet import the rest - regardless of whether the nation holds a flat out bit of leeway in all items.

See the section on positive-and lose-lose circumstances for a short clarification of why.

it gave them more rights

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )