The concept of business torts is an interesting area of the law. we learned that a tort is a violation of a known legal duty owed to another person (as opposed to contract liability that only arises if both parties to a contract voluntarily enter into an agreement). most business against business legal controversies involve breach of contracts, but under certain areas of tort law, one business can owe a duty of care to another absent a voluntary agreement between the two on how to conduct commerce. comment on the following: is there a legitimate reason society needs laws to make sure businesses respect the rights of another business, or is the capitalistic/free competition environment impeded by such laws? should commerce be conducted in simply an unregulated, let the best competitive forces prevail world?

this is an outline for the decisions that frankie is going to make

opportunity cost

willingness to buy

price or quality

of course, there could be many economic strategies that should be considered important while making decision. opportunity cost is the foremost significant factor while considering any economic option. when you buy something, you should know how much you are forgoing for this product. indeed, you could buy something different with this measure if you changed your mind. willingness to buy shows how much surplus you are earning while making a decision. it is important because it shows you buy what you want or you buy because you have only limited amount of money. the price or quality can be considered as a general economic option that we are applying while buying something. when you buy something, price or quality could be one of the options. indeed, they define the characteristics of the product.    

mark brainliest!

answer; shays rebellion;

answer; the above statement is *(false);