In the context of the study conducted by lewchuk et al. (2016) on the social and economic effects of precarious employment in the greater toronto-hamilton area, which of the following statements is true of low earnings and economic uncertainty?

For each of the following, mark whether it is a possible confounder (a factor that mixes up the results, making it look like candy is to blame when it's a causal (or causation) link which supports the argument that candy causes criminal behavior (ie, explains how candy leads to criminality ), or neither (an irrelevant factor, something that may cause people to become criminals but has nothing to do with eating candy). choose your answers based only< on the information given. additives in candy- additives found in candy may adversely affect brain development of young children in ways that could contribute towards adult aggression. impulsive personality-- kids who are highly impulsive and have trouble delaying gratification are more likely to eat candy every day as children and more likely to disobey laws as adults. violent abuse-- children who suffer violent abuse are more likely to become violent adults and commit violent crimes. gender- boys are overwhelmingly more likely to commit violent crimes

If there were no system of checks and balance,the process of government would eventually fall apart. do you agree with this opinion? why or why not?

Figure out who is lying and telling the are 2 truth telers and 3 liarsperson a says person e is lyingperson b says person c is lyingperson c says person b id lyingperson d says person b is telling the truthperson e says person c is telling the truth