Tavia is making an argument that a particular cable service provider has the most satisfied customers in her community. The support for her inductive argument would be strongest if she used which of the following methods to gather facts?

read quotes about quality from the commercial website of the cable service provider
find a central location that a wide variety of residents frequentto solicit opinions over several days

The support for her inductive argument would be strongest if she goes and finds a central location that a wide variety of residents frequent to solicit opinions over several days.

Explanation:

Reading the quotes about quality from the commercial website of the cable service provider is a very poor method of truly ascertaining quality.

All the cable service providers will speak well of their product definitely and this means a number of non-factual, hyped, biased and untrue statements will be on each service provider's website.

I Mean, firms with poor services and products don't go about posting it on their commercial websites!

The other option is more randomized, generalized and fair because all these strangers would most likely state the truth about each of the cable service providers.

the fourth amendment protects:

"the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."  

so this would mean the denial to search and seizure without warrant or permission.