Judicial review works in which of the following ways? Select all that apply.1. the federal court performing statutory construction of interpreting administrative rules2. deciding whether the immigration law of Wisconsin has violated the Constitution3. holding the government to a code of conduct4. nullifying Executive Orders5. taking on cases like Marbury vs. Madison involving executive privilege

2. deciding whether the immigration law of Wisconsin has violated the Constitution

5. taking on cases like Marbury vs. Madison involving executive privilege

Explanation: Judicial review is a type of court proceeding whereby a judge ascertains or reviews the lawfulness of a decision taken by a public body. The review calls into question the processes leading up to the decision and if it followed due process rather than determining if the decision or action taken is right or wrong. For example, taking a good or beneficial action while not following the rule of law.

The judicial review is not about proving the actions are warranted or beneficial, all that matters is that arriving at said decision was lawful and followed due process which criteria only options 2 and 5 satisfy.

the first two-party system consisted of the federalist party, who supported the ratification of the constitution, and the democratic-republican party or the anti-administration party (anti-federalists), who opposed the powerful central government, among others, that the constitution established when it took effect in

yes

it is because 3 because the citizen the northern democratic party watned the warning on red to blue because it is purple. lol