subject
Social Studies, 15.01.2020 17:31 bhenley

Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry?
a. they are drawn by people who are directly involved in the events they are depicting.
b. they are drawn by people who have an opinion about the event.
c. historians do not consider political cartoons to be credible historical evidence.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Explain the events that led to the iranian revolution and the following iranian hostage crisis. how was the united states involved with iran? describe the arab-israeli conflicts of the 20th century. be sure to include specific military interventions, peace agreements, and the ultimate reason for conflict.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 14:30
In what ways did the compromise of 1850 and the kansas-nebraska act of 1854 differ from the missouri compromise? both compromises used the established 36°30′ parallel to determine if territories would become free or slave states. both compromises used the mason-dixon line to determine if the territories would become free or slave states. both compromises let territories use popular sovereignty to determine if they would become free or slave states. both compromises only granted congress the power to determine if territories would become free or slave states.
Answers: 3
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 15:10
What is federalism? what is federalism
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 19:30
What conflict ended the false doctrine of "states rights"
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Why do historians consider political cartoons to be credible resources in historical inquiry?
...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2020 21:58
question
Mathematics, 22.05.2020 21:58
Questions on the website: 13722360