subject
Social Studies, 17.04.2020 23:44 kedjenpierrelouis

Fact Scenario: Frank is an independent contractor and a known prankster
working at the offices of Untame Workplaces, Inc., a manufacturer of fireworks. One day, Frank is in the office with his co-workers Charles and Barbara, who are both employees of Untame. Just as Charles is sitting down to work on inserting fuses into bottle rockets at his work station, as a joke Frank violently yanks Charles's metal chair out from under Charles. The chair hits Barbara in the leg, breaking her ankle. As the chair scrapes shoots across the cement floor, it also creates a spark. The spark ignites the gunpowder near Charles's station, making the chair explode into pieces. A metal shard from the chair hits Frank in an eye, permanently blinding him in that eye. The chair is made by Merman Hiller Chair Company. Meanwhile, Charles, who suffers from anxiety disorder, has a panic attack from the sound of the explosion.
1. Who can sue whom for what torts? Explain.
2. Explain what difference it makes if Untame has workers' compensation policy in place.

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:00
Two police officers stopped a car for a minor traffic violation. while one of the officers dealt with the driver and the traffic violation, the other officer talked with the passenger. seeking to question the passenger about gang involvement, but lacking reasonable suspicions of criminal activity, the officer ordered the passenger out of the car. as the passenger exited the car, the officer saw a bulge in the passenger's coat which the officer suspected might be a gun. upon patting down the passenger, the officer felt the handle of a revolver and removed the gun. the passenger, who was a convicted felon, was charged with the possession of a gun by a prohibited possessor. prior to trial, the defendant sought to suppress the gun as evidence, contending that its seizure was unconstitutional. should the court suppress the gun as evidence? ayes, because, since the car had been stopped for a traffic violation, the officer could not order the passenger, who had not committed the violation, to exit the car. byes, because, since the officer lacked reasonable suspicion that the passenger was engaged in criminal activity, the officer could not pat down the passenger. cno, because a valid traffic stop gives an officer the right to pat down a passenger. dno, because the gun was discovered as a consequence of a valid terry stop and frisk.
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
When zhang qin went to explore west, he brought back stories of
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 18:10
What are the relation of community dynamics and community action to applied social sciences?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 22:00
Which us president proposed a decimal based measurement system for the us
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Fact Scenario: Frank is an independent contractor and a known prankster
working at the offices...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2021 03:50
question
Computers and Technology, 04.10.2021 03:50
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2021 03:50
question
Mathematics, 04.10.2021 04:00
Questions on the website: 13722363