Mr. and Mrs. Lang own a house together. Mrs. Lang records a Declaration of Homestead on the house, without obtaining Mr. Lang's signature. The house is worth $300,000, and $215,000 remains to be paid on a first deed of trust. If a creditor obtains a judgment against the Langs, the creditor:A. may foreclose because both signatures must be on the Declaration of HomesteadB. may not foreclose because a judgment lien is always inferior to a homestead exemptionC. may foreclose because the net value of the homesteaded property is less than the exemptionD. may not foreclose because the net value of the homesteaded property is less than the exemption

Loftus used her research to prove that a. memories of childhood trauma are usually true b. adults’ memories are concrete and rigid c. children have better memories than adults d. false memories could be created using suggestion

What recommendations would you give to your local community to to decrease the local effects of human impact on the environment? list 2 recommendations and how they will positively impact your community. 3. what recommendations would you give to the global governments to decrease the global effects of human impact on the environment? list 2 recommendations and how they will positively impact our planet.

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.