For an online course that you are enrolled in there are two required proctored exams. You have secured the proctor, a friend of yours who is a former teacher from your high school. You requested to use her as a proctor and she’s been verified and accepted. The first exam went smoothly. However, for the second exam, the proctor was unable to meet. She was also unable to reschedule that week or the following. The two of you decided that she would give you the access code to the exam and you took it without her being present. Is this a violation of academic integrity?

Arthur met rottweiler breeders lynda and george at a dog show in rhode island. the couple, who reside in new york state, later sold several rottweiler dogs to arthur who lived in rhode island. arthur later sued lynda and george, claiming that the dogs were sick and infirm. he filed a complaint in rhode island courts, claiming that even though the dogs were sold in new york, the breeders had attended the dog show and advertised in the rottweiler newsletter which was distributed at the event in rhode island. based on the facts, do you think rhode island courts have personal jurisdiction in this case?