1. Over time, how did the American Indians adapt to solve the problem of scarcity of food? 2.How did the changes in technology from spear to atlatl to bow and arrow improve the American Indian’s way of life? Did these changes come slowly or quickly? Explain.
3.What evidence is there of early people being able to specialize in doing activities which made life better for the whole society?
4.As time elapsed, what types of natural resources did American Indians use to provide shelter?
5.What impact did European exploration have of American Indians in Georgia?
please put the number by whatever question you answer.

4.As time elapsed, what types of natural resources did American Indians use to provide shelter?

Explanation:   MAIN PART OF THE ANSWER IS IN BOLD!

Shelter was made from the material around them (saplings, leaves, small branches, animal fur). Native peoples of the past farmed, hunted, and fished. They used natural resources such as rock, twine, bark, and oyster shell to farm, hunt, and fish.

3.What evidence is there of early people being able to specialize in doing activities which made life better for the whole society?

Answer- These Three Pieces Of Evidence Are The Answer

1. the creation and use of tools

2. new subsistence patterns

3. the occupation of new environmental zones

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.