Suppose there are 100 students who want to buy sneakers. The store, however, only has 50 pairs. Should the store owner raise or lower the price of the sneakers?

Explanation:

Because of the high demand and the low quantity, the store should raise the price as this will allow them to have a greater profit. This would make it almost competitive for those who want the sneakers. They will be the ones who are desperate to obtain them and will do anything to get them. This can allow a lot of popularity and business for the store.

its d i know cause i've been googling it

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.