Jack is stopped by the police and arrested, he is read his rights and thrown into a holding cell. Five days later he is taken in front of a judge and jury with no information about what crime he has been accused or what evidence the state has against him. If this happened in the U. S., which of Jack’s rights are clearly being abused from the 6th Amendment?

know ur rights

You can say, "I do not want to talk to you" and walk away calmly.

If the answer is yes, you can just walk away. If the officer says you are not under arrest, but you are not free to go, this is called being "detained." Being detained is not the same as being arrested. However, the police can arrest you later in the same encounter.

Explanation:

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.

clearly, he hasn't been informed of the nature and cause of the accusation or had witnesses in front of him or had anyone in his favor.

Explanation:

the best and most correct answer among the choices provided by the question is the second choice "less supportive to the war of 1812"

the war of 1812 was a military conflict that lasted from june 1812 to february 1815, fought between the united states of america and the united kingdom, its north american colonies, and its native american allies.

i hope my answer has come to your . god bless and have a nice day ahead!

2b2t

explanation:

2b2t