Which scenario best illustrates the principle of popular sovereignty

The answer is option "C"

Explanation:

popular sovereignty is the rule that the authority of a state and its administration are made and supported by the consent of its people, through their chosen agents (rule by the individuals), who are the wellspring of all political force. popular sovereignty communicates an idea, and doesn't really reflect or depict a political reality.

To discuss popular sovereignty is to put extreme expert in the individuals. There are an assortment of manners by which power might be communicated. It could be quick as in individuals make the law themselves, or intervened through delegates who are dependent upon political decision and review; it very well might be extreme as in individuals have a negative or blackball over enactment, or it very well might be something significantly less sensational. So, mainstream sway covers a large number of institutional prospects. For each situation, in any case, popular sovereignty accepts the presence of some type of famous assent, and it is thus that each meaning of conservative government infers a theory of consent.

in brief the senate may propose or concur with amendments as on other bills.

explanation:

the topics being handled in article 1, section 7, of the u.s constitution, revolve around two issues: the first, the correct procedure to pass legislation regarding revenue production through tax, and the second, the correct process for creating and passing law. in the first case, the text of the constitution literally states that all bills regarding the raising of money, or revenue, need to first be proposed by the house of representatives, although the senate may also play a role here by either proposing such a bill to the house, or agreeing with one being proposed by the house. the second portion, speaks about the process to create, pass and enact legislation. the bill must first be raised by one of the houses, then it must be voted by the plenaries of both houses, and then, it must be presented to the president of the united states, who will either accept it, or veto it, and send it back for reconsideration. if it is not sent back, then the bill is passed into law. if sent back by the president, then the house where the bill originated from will vote again, and if passed by two thirds of the majority, then it goes to the other house, with the observations from the president, for voting. if it passes there as well, then, the bill becomes law, with a few exceptions. this is what is explained in article i, section 7, of the u.s constitution.

hope this have a great