LT8 Which of the following precedents are NOT a part of the jurisprudence deciding schools' ability to regulate public school/student expression rights in a
constitutionally acceptable way? (HINT: 3 of these Are True AND Apply to Student
Expression while 1 of these EITHER Is False OR Is True, But Does Not Apply to
Student Expression.) *
Schenck v. United States allows schools to limit dangerous student Speech or Press
that has a "Clear and Present Danger".
Bethel SD v. Fraser allowed schools to limit Speech or Press that was “offensive or
obscene according to local standards".
Morse v. Frederick allowed schools to limit Speech or Press that supported or
advanced illegal activities, such as drug use.
Tinker v. Des Moines allowed schools to regulate Speech or Press that disrupted the
education or discipline of the school.