Why did the Anti-Federalists want a bill of rights included in the Constitution? They wanted to strengthen to power of the national government.
They wanted people's rights to be protected.
They wanted to make trouble for the Federalists.
They wanted to give more power to the state governments.

A. in weeks v. united states (1914), the court established the exclusionary rule, which was incorporated to the states in mapp v. ohio (1961), and the court established the concept of a "good faith exception" to the exclusionary rule in united states v. leon (1984). in their opinion, the supreme court pointed out that compliance with the exclusionary rule can have a cost to society (criminals can go free) that outweighs the benefits (stopping illegal searches by police). ultimately, the court determined that despite the exclusionary rule, evidence can still be admitted in situations where police made genuine "good faith" efforts to act legally, but technically acted illegally, in obtaining the evidence. explain the exclusionary rule good faith exception and explain and support whether you agree or disagree with the concept of a good faith exception to the exclusionary rule? why or why not? use the lesson notes and/or one news source to support your answer.

Where did thomas pain right the federalist papers

Which article of the us constitution addresses the issue of interpeting the laws of the united states