subject
Social Studies, 04.02.2021 06:20 cathyfrawley

In 1896, a black man named Homer Plessy sat in a train car for whites only. He did this intentionally to challenge segregation. His case, Plessy v. Ferguson, made it to the Supreme Court. The court ruled that segregation was, in fact, constitutional. The ruling held that segregation was legal as long as there were separate but equal options for black and white people. This set a precedent that would remain in place for almost 60 years. In reality, the options for black people were usually of much lower quality, and in 1954 the concept of “separate but equal” was completely overturned. The following year, in 1955, a black woman named Rosa Parks made history in Alabama when she refused to give up her seat to a white passenger. Based on the passage, how would you best explain Homer Plessy's reasoning for sitting in a white train car? *
14 points
A. to challenge the legality of segregation
B. to follow in Rosa Parks’ footsteps
C. to prove that separate was equal
D. to try to pass as a white man

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 21.06.2019 18:30
What were some of the different and mutual demands of the various national unions? what tactics did they employ to realize their demands?
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 03:30
In russia, after the soviet union collapse, influential retained power by acquiring large numbers of , so the ruling class gained power in place of power.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:00
How did presidential reconstruction allow black codes to be passed
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 11:00
About how many crusaders took part in the crusaders
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In 1896, a black man named Homer Plessy sat in a train car for whites only. He did this intentionall...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722361